• Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
  • Follow us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
Crooked Marquee
  • Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
Home
Looking Back

Harvey’s Hellhole: Pret-A-Porter

Sep 20th, 2022 Craig D. Lindsey 281
Harvey’s Hellhole: Pret-A-Porter

Welcome to Harvey’s Hellhole, a monthly column devoted to spotlighting the movies that were poorly marketed, mishandled, reshaped, neglected or just straight-up destroyed by Harvey Weinstein during his reign as one of the most powerful studio chiefs in Hollywood. Since September is Fashion Week season (and Vogue’s annual, mammoth September issue is currently on sale), let’s go back to when a legendary filmmaker and a gaggle of movie stars went to Paris to wreak havoc on the already-crazy fashion industry – on Weinstein’s dime! 

The 1994 film Ready to Wear (Pret-a-Porter) is quite possibly the most ridiculous thing Robert Altman ever did – and, yes, I have seen Popeye. (Actually, Popeye was the first Altman I ever saw, but we’ll save that story for another time.)

At the time, the maverick director behind such subversive ‘70s masterworks as MASH, Nashville, McCabe & Mrs. Miller and The Long Goodbye was having a nice career resurgence. His savage, savvy 1992 adaptation of Michael Tolkin’s novel The Player, where he got Tim Robbins and a bunch of movie stars to join him in taking the piss outta Hollywood, was a much-buzzed-about hit, eventually receiving several Oscar nods, including Best Director. He followed that up a year later with Short Cuts, an acclaimed, all-star ensemble piece inspired by several Raymond Carver short stories.

After Cuts successfully played at Cannes, he hooked up with Harvey Weinstein and Miramax for his next project, which would be set in the fashion industry. It was an idea he toyed with ever since he and his wife caught a Paris fashion show while promoting his 1984 film Streamers. “I couldn’t believe what I saw,” he said in a 1994 interview. “It was such a circus. It was just too theatrical not to want to film.” 

With an estimated $18 million budget, Altman rounded up another A-list cast: Julia Roberts, Sophia Loren, Kim Basinger, Lauren Bacall, Anouk Aimee, Tim Robbins, Marcello Mastroianni, Stephen Rea, Forest Whitaker, Rupert Everett. Altman and his cast would head to Paris, while various fashion designers showed off their spring collections. They all infiltrated the runway shows, with the cast playing characters intermingling with real designers, models, and other celebrities. Think Medium Cool – but with stylish clothes.

The shoot was unsurprisingly a grueling, guerilla affair. Altman was both quite ill and quite frustrated about not being able to understand these French folks. And although he and journalist-turned-screenwriter Barbara Shulgasser flew to Paris during its 1992 Fashion Week to come up with a story, there wasn’t a shooting script. Not only that, Danny Aiello, who played a cross-dressing department-store buyer, was pissing off everyone, mostly getting into it with Bacall and Everett. (However, he was quite sycophantic with Mastroianni.)

Of course, the fashion industry was worried, fearing they would get dragged the same way the film industry did in Player. Karl Lagerfeld, Anna Wintour and Women’s Wear Daily publisher John Fairchild were some of the powerful people who snubbed the production. (“These people are just paranoid,” Altman told the Los Angeles Times in 1994.) More controversy awaited in the weeks leading up to its Christmas Day release (when it would play 1,000 screens – the widest release for an Altman film at the time). Miramax, which previously changed the film’s title to Ready to Wear since the original Pret-a-Porter was deemed too French for U.S. audiences, went back and forth with the MPAA. They were threatening to revoke Ready’s R rating if film-related advertising featuring a semi-nude Helena Christensen would continue to be used. (The threat was later withdrawn when Miramax won MPAA approval for a revised ad.) 

While the industry wasn’t completely eviscerated in Ready, it was portrayed as a business filled with horny, petulant assholes. More of a screwball, bedroom farce than a cutthroat satire, Ready has a gallery of characters either getting into trouble or someone’s pants in the City of Light. Mastroianni plays a mysterious figure who comes to town, hoping to win back an old flame (Loren), but goes on the lam after his flame’s husband (Jean-Pierre Cassel) accidentally dies in his presence. (This whole subplot seemed to be an excuse for Altman to not only work with Italian screen legends Loren and Mastroianni, but to recreate the iconic striptease scene from Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.) 

Elsewhere in this universe, Roberts and Robbins play two ugly-American journalists who spend most of the time fighting and boffing in a hotel room; Rea is a rock-star photographer who continually humiliates a trio of rival fashion editors (Linda Hunt, Sally Kellerman, Tracey Ullman) all angling to work with him; Aimee is an aging designer with a scheming, philandering son (Everett), who’s secretly conspiring with a bootmaking pair (Bacall, Lyle Lovett); and Whitaker is a gay designer wrapped up in a wild love quadrangle with another designer (Richard E. Grant) and their significant others. All the while, Basinger’s airhead TV reporter is around trying to get on-the-spot interviews with everyone. (Chiara Mastroianni, Marcello’s daughter, plays her long-suffering assistant.)

It got scathing reviews from critics in both the film and fashion worlds after its release. USA Today fashion reporter Elizabeth Snead said it was a “mix of misogynist, sexist, Francophobic and homophobic barbs with no humorous insight into the industry,” while Time film critic Richard Corliss called it “a hate letter” to the industry. Although Altman has said that Ready is a valentine to fashion, even the most style-ignorant person (like the person currently writing this) can see how Altman paints the fashion world in broad, condescending strokes. From his perspective, it’s less about clothes and more about chaos. By the time he reaches the grand finale, a predictably pretentious nod to The Emperor’s New Clothes where Aimee’s fed-up fashionista puts on an all-nude fashion show that everybody in the crowd eats up, it’s quite clear that Altman views all of this as trivial, very expensive, very decadent nonsense.

After Ready, Altman (who died in 2006) went back to making films on a smaller, less extravagant scale. (Weinstein and Paul Newman once hollered at him about making a movie “about a bear,” but left the project when they wanted to take the film to Canada to save $2 million.) Since it’s been recently reported that Ready will be one of several Miramax titles that might get remade as a TV show, there’s a strong possibility that there will be some Hollywood stars in Paris soon, once again starting some silly, snooty, sophisticated shit for the cameras.

Ready to Wear (Pret-a-Porter) is streaming on Kanopy and Pluto TV. It’s also available to rent or buy.    

  • Tags
  • harveys hellhole
  • looking back

Share this post:

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest E-mail
Craig D. Lindsey

Craig D. Lindsey

Related Posts
Classic Corner: <i>Once Upon a Time in the West</i>
Sean Burns
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Once Upon a Time in the West

May 26th, 2023
<i>Bruce Almighty</i> at 20: Hollywood’s One Spiritual Sensation
Marshall Shaffer
Happy Birthday

Bruce Almighty at 20: Hollywood’s One Spiritual Sensation

May 24th, 2023
The Dark Ocean Endures: <i>Finding Nemo</i> at 20
Will DiGravio
Happy Birthday

The Dark Ocean Endures: Finding Nemo at 20

May 24th, 2023
Peckinpah’s Elegy: <i>Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid</i> at 50
Zach Vasquez
Happy Birthday

Peckinpah’s Elegy: Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid at 50

May 22nd, 2023
Classic Corner: <i>Rebel Without a Cause</i>
Jason Bailey
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Rebel Without a Cause

May 19th, 2023
Seijun Suzuki Against the Machine
Craig J. Clark
Looking Back

Seijun Suzuki Against the Machine

May 17th, 2023
Trending
Jul 20th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

1990: The Year of Danny Elfman

May 30th 9:00 AM
Reviews

The Best Movies to Buy or Stream This Week: Being Mary Tyler Moore, Three Thousand Years of Longing, Night of the Hunter, and More

Oct 27th 11:00 AM
Looking Back

Requiem for a Dream and The Ballad of Sara Goldfarb

Apr 1st 9:15 AM
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Hud

Aug 1st 4:50 PM
Culture

Personal Reflections on The Great Movie Ride (R.I.P.)

Nov 17th 9:00 AM
Movies

The Strange, Sordid Tale of Charles Bronson Lookalike Robert Bronzi

May 20th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Coonskin

Apr 13th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

#ReleaseTheRussellCut: Where’s the Uncut Version of The Devils?

Jan 12th 9:00 AM
Movies

The Curious Case of Roderick Jaynes

May 15th 9:00 AM
Movies

Cage Match: Nicolas Cage’s Character Names, Ranked

Looking for something else?
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
cmpopcorn_white3.svg
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Writers Guidelines
  • Members
    • Login
    • SignUp
    • Forums
telephone icon [email protected]
envelope icon [email protected]

© 2014- Crooked™ Publishing


Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}