{"id":15008,"date":"2020-09-30T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-09-30T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/?p=15008"},"modified":"2024-03-02T21:17:46","modified_gmt":"2024-03-03T05:17:46","slug":"each-person-you-speak-to-has-had-a-day-hearing-others-in-inside-out-and-anomolisa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/each-person-you-speak-to-has-had-a-day-hearing-others-in-inside-out-and-anomolisa\/","title":{"rendered":"“Each Person You Speak to Has Had a Day”: Hearing Others in Inside Out<\/i> and Anomolisa<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Pixar\u2019s Inside Out<\/em> opens with a question: \u201cDo you ever look at someone and wonder, \u2018What is going on inside their head?\u2019\u201d Within the same medium, released the same year, Charlie Kaufman\u2019s Anomalisa<\/em> provided an opposite answer. And yet, according to Kaufman, we shouldn\u2019t contrast the pair: as the filmmaker said in an interview<\/a>, \u201cThere is a great gulf, [a] chasm, between these movies.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps Kaufman\u2019s animosity makes sense: Inside Out<\/em> and Anomolisa<\/em> competed for the Best Animated Feature Academy Award at the 2015 Oscars, and it\u2019s worth wondering if Anomalisa<\/em> even qualifies as \u201canimation.\u201d The film evolved from a stage play into a puppet-based stop-motion feature thanks to a crowdfunding campaign. Anomolisa<\/em> was produced completely independently for pennies, especially compared to the $175 million it cost director Pete Docter to deliver Inside Out<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, Inside Out<\/em> took home the golden statue. Yet despite the David-and-Goliath dynamics behind the scenes, both Anomalisa<\/em> and Inside Out<\/em> plunge headfirst into their subjects\u2019 subconscious, demonstrating the endless bounds of subjectivity on an expressionist canvas only possible outside of live-action cinema. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inside Out<\/em> looks, well, inward. We see representations of the many emotions of Riley, a middle schooler at the end of childhood, on the first steps of whatever comes next. Her family has just moved to San Francisco, and we experience Riley\u2019s flux from the point-of-view of her emotions: Joy (Amy Pohler), Sadness (Phylis Smith), Anger (Lewis Black), Fear (Bill Hader) and Disgust (Mindy Kaling). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anomalisa<\/em> doesn\u2019t boast an entire NBC sitcom of voice talent\u2013 in fact, its cast has only three actors. Michael (David Thewlis) arrives in Cincinnati to give a speech on customer service, but everyone he meets \u2013 from his cabbie to the guy at the front desk of his hotel, even his wife, son and ex-girlfriend \u2013 has the same voice (Tom Noonan). Only the vocal cords of Lisa (Jennifer Jason-Leigh), a woman he meets late that night, break through the noise. Until they don\u2019t. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

If Inside Out<\/em> takes a peek at the voices in our heads, Anomolisa<\/em> asks what happens when those voices become all we can hear. Ironically, Riley and Michael share a similar isolation, an inability to connect with others. Riley can\u2019t tell her parents her feelings of sadness and anxiety around her move away from Minnesota, the same feelings that have her crying in class on the first day of sixth grade, in a mortifying sequence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The source of Michael\u2019s predicament is a bit more difficult to trace, as Kaufman and co-director Duke Johnson don\u2019t show us anything outside of Michael\u2019s work trip. Instead of literally going into his head, Michael\u2019s psychology is grafted onto those around him. Everyone has the same voice, because they\u2019re all the same to him. He bristles from small talk and dodges a call from his spouse and son. From the minute we meet him, it\u2019s clear Michael is sick of their collective, droning voice. No one is real to Michael, and no one is worth talking to. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kaufman originally credited the play to \u201cFrancis Fregoli,\u201d and Michael stays at a hotel named \u201cThe Fregoli.\u201d It\u2019s a reference to The Fregoli Delusion, a real mental illness in which an individual believes all people around them are a single person. I\u2019m not sure Kaufman would literally diagnose Michael with this condition, because doing so would minimize Michael\u2019s agency in his own self-destruction. Michael and Lisa sleep together, in the film\u2019s most tender sequence, a shockingly frank and awkward depiction of sex on-screen (made somewhat unsettling considering we\u2019re watching puppets).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in the morning, Lisa starts to sound different. As Michael asserts his vision for their relationship, her voice cracks. In the span of a single conversation, she loses her \u201canomalous\u201d status, becoming another Tom Noonan. With Michael\u2019s desire to sleep with Lisa fulfilled, he loses his ability to conceptualize her \u2013 Lisa morphs into another person he can\u2019t hear. He will alienate her, and remain alienated from everyone else. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a sense, what Michael can\u2019t hear is what Inside Out<\/em> so gracefully shows: every individual carries a complex and valuable mechanism of self inside their heads. You are meant to see yourself in Riley, to recognize your own distance from childhood, the way melancholy now colors happy memories. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But Inside Out<\/em> generally refrains from showing many other heads besides Riley\u2019s. Thirty-seven minutes in, there\u2019s a dinner table scene in which we glimpse the emotions of Riley\u2019s parents, and the final sequence cuts to the \u201cheadquarters\u201d of a number of strangers (and even some animals). Of course, had Pixar truly incorporated more than one subconscious into the narrative, Inside Out<\/em> could\u2019ve easily descended into cacophony. Then again, isn\u2019t cacophony representative of seriously interacting with other people who\u2019re just as complex as you? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the third act, we learn that if Riley\u2019s Joy and Sadness can\u2019t reconcile each other, Riley will lose her ability to feel anything. Crisis is eventually averted, and the movie concludes with Riley a well-adjusted tween. But there\u2019s an individualist undercurrent here: Riley solves herself. She is the solution to her turmoil. If I had to guess, I\u2019d say this is the source of Kaufman\u2019s dislike of the film: across the filmmaker\u2019s oeuvre, he\u2019s been adamant that we need to connect with other people if we\u2019re to have any hope of fulfillment and satisfaction. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

With Anomolisa<\/em>, Kaufman illustrates what happens when we don\u2019t. It concludes on a note no studio would ever pitch, let alone spend the GDP of a small nation to produce: nothing changes for Michael. We find him back home, more alone than ever, even as he\u2019s surrounded by \u201cloved\u201d ones. Michael\u2019s selfishness has made it so he cannot break out of his own prison alone, and those same walls stop him from reaching anyone who could help. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It seems unfair to ignore the ranging target audiences of these pictures: Inside Out<\/em> is meant for children, Anomolisa<\/em>\u2019s most certainly not. Hopelessness has been baked into Michael, but not an eleven-year-old. But by placing these films in conversation with each other, the limits of Inside Out\u2019s<\/em> focus and individualism become clear. Just a few years later, Bo Burnham\u2019s Eighth Grade<\/em> dealt with an equally-aged ennui, but clearly pointed to other people as the solution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The danger of Inside Out<\/em> boils down to blurring the line between introspection and self-absorption. Viewers who identify with Riley should see a cautionary tale in Michael: obviously he\u2019s deeply complex, but reconciling oneself is only half the battle. On the other hand, the danger of Anomolisa <\/em>is failing to see yourself in Michael: he\u2019s living an extreme of something we all exhibit. Regardless of whose subconscious you\u2019re entering, eventually, we all need to get out of our heads, and reach each other. \"\"\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The two animated 2015 animated features are worlds apart \u2013 yet strangely aligned in questions of empathy and introspection. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":569,"featured_media":15013,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1399],"tags":[1422,162],"class_list":["post-15008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-looking-back","tag-looking-back","tag-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/569"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15008"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15008\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22711,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15008\/revisions\/22711"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}