{"id":16673,"date":"2021-06-15T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-15T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/?p=16673"},"modified":"2024-03-02T21:14:28","modified_gmt":"2024-03-03T05:14:28","slug":"siskel-ebert-chicken-soup-for-the-critical-soul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/siskel-ebert-chicken-soup-for-the-critical-soul\/","title":{"rendered":"<i>Siskel &#038; Ebert<\/i>: Chicken Soup for the Critical Soul"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>On March 1<sup>st<\/sup>, 1982, a few months before leaving <em>Sneak Previews <\/em>and a few more before syndication, Siskel and Ebert made their first appearance on <em>Late Night with David Letterman<\/em>. Right away, Letterman jabbed them in the work ethic. Just as fast, Roger parried, \u201cNine \u2018o clock last Christmas morning, I was at the Chicago Theater.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dave, all teeth: \u201cOh that\u2019s a sad, ugly story.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This has been my sad, ugly story for several months. At night, I don\u2019t sleep or put on a movie to speed that process or, Lord help me, write. No, when the only light left is my TV, I sprawl out, crack a box of shredded wheats, and let the YouTube algorithm work as trained. It is time for the boys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert spent an uninterrupted 24 years on the air together in neighboring aisle seats. That equates to roughly 950 episodes, 16 Oscar specials, seven Holiday Video Gift Guides, four titles, four jingles, three Wonder Dogs, two thumbs, one Stinker Skunk, and one fateful coin toss that immortalized their names in that order for the rest of recorded history.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s a miracle that this particular history was recorded at all. The earliest incarnations, <em>Opening Soon At A Theater Near You <\/em>and <em>Sneak Previews<\/em>, fell victim to the churn-and-burn of public television. What survives on dubbed VHS is a testament to the pair as appointment viewing. The Disney era &#8211; <em>Siskel &amp; Ebert <\/em>&#8211; was archived in its entirety on AtTheMoviesTV.com in 2007 but abandoned just five years later.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"673\" src=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert2-1024x673.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16674\" srcset=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert2-1024x673.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert2-768x505.jpg 768w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert2-1536x1010.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert2.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Now all the surviving episodes, ABC feast and PBS famine, are dignified by the same tracking fuzz. It makes tumbling through the decades, 20 minutes at a time, seamless, though you do form preferences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My favorite intro is the <em>Ebert &amp; Siskel <\/em>contest of newspaper trucks with the shameless saxophone that sounds played through a couch-cushion in even the cleanest dubs. And for all the latter-day thumb iconography, I find the <em>Sneak Previews <\/em>model of literally saying \u201cYes\u201d or \u201cNo\u201d to a movie much funnier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Depending on who you ask, that simple dichotomy is responsible for everything from the rise of Rotten Tomatoes to the death of cinema. Watching anything more than a \u201c10 Best On-Air Fights\u201d compilation pins the blame firmly on the misunderstanding, not the misunderstood. Their agreements now sound like a canary song.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s why this show we\u2019re doing is very important,\u201d says Gene in an episode on overlooked films of the 1970s, \u201cWe\u2019ve got to encourage people to go with these [filmmakers] and take risks, otherwise we\u2019re going to end up always with <em>The Fish That Eats People<\/em>.\u201d They fought against the coming McMonoculture in real-time, unnerved by what they deemed \u201cThe Great American Hit.\u201d As success found new metrics in four quadrants and opening weekends, Siskel seethed: \u201cSo what? Why does this picture <em>have <\/em>to appeal to everybody?\u201d In a special on Steven Spielberg, an artist respected enough to appear twice on Roger\u2019s Best of the 1980s list, Gene complains that his \u201cGreat American Hits\u201d are ultimately sexless. No filmmaker got a free ride, not even those we now coat weekly with Teflon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In an episode about miscalled shots, Gene needles Roger about his one-star review of <em>Blue Velvet<\/em>. The defendant, noted screenwriter of <em>Beyond the Valley of the Dolls<\/em>, cites his moral disgust at Isabella Rossellini\u2019s \u201cexploited\u201d nudity. Further questioning only hardens his resolve: \u201cI must be honest in how I feel.\u201d He concludes by praising Lynch\u2019s artistry and recommending the film anyhow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert3-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-16675\" srcset=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert3-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert3-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/siskel-ebert3.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>As much as Siskel and Ebert were well-intentioned ambassadors of their art &#8211; fighting against pan-and-scan, proposing a new rating between R and X, advocating for Black cinema &#8211; they didn\u2019t mistake themselves for green vegetables or divine authorities. As a virtual tour of his basement screening room proved, for all his renown, Roger kept his stereo on the Styrofoam like everybody else. In the same episode where he pans <em>Die Hard <\/em>for its preposterously written cops, him and Gene gush over <em>The Dead Pool <\/em>as the best <em>Dirty Harry <\/em>since the original. Stick around past the contemporary novelties, though, and they just might sell you on the latest Eric Rohmer film.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In an age when every critic is Schr\u00f6dinger&#8217;s Sellout, allegedly bought for and against all major studios, <em>Siskel &amp; Ebert <\/em>plays like fantasy. Of a time when two experts who did nothing more than talk about their passion could stumble into the spotlight and stay there for decades. Of a time when the resulting death threats were, if not non-existent, impossible to see and the popular form of protest was changing the channel. Of a time when, to paraphrase the <em>At the Movies <\/em>intro, it was economically feasible for writers to pack popcorn in their briefcases and go to work.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They charted a course from the gilded <em>Then <\/em>to the engorged <em>Now<\/em>, but allow no undue nostalgia for the in-between currently presented as the dawn of cinema by your streaming service of choice.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;\u201cI wonder whether people haven\u2019t just seen so much television that they think that they\u2019re supposed to understand every single moment of every single movie that they see,\u201d said Ebert in 1980, immediately after that remark about <em>The Fish That Eats People<\/em>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s lines like those that give me pause between shredded wheats. But invariably, right when the doom starts to overtake, Gene does something like threaten to curbstomp Roger if his favorite Bond isn\u2019t Sean Connery. Then I laugh, cry, and look for another balcony seat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What a sad, ugly story. What a dream. <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-12029\" style=\"width: 21px;\" src=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/crookedc-01.svg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an increasingly tricky critical environment, there\u2019s something oddly comforting about revisiting reruns of the two most iconic critics of their era.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":475,"featured_media":16676,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1381],"tags":[162],"class_list":["post-16673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-movies","tag-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/475"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16673"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22266,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16673\/revisions\/22266"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}