{"id":18212,"date":"2022-04-27T09:01:00","date_gmt":"2022-04-27T16:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/?p=18212"},"modified":"2024-03-02T21:12:52","modified_gmt":"2024-03-03T05:12:52","slug":"the-cautionary-tale-prescience-of-tron-and-the-lawnmower-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/the-cautionary-tale-prescience-of-tron-and-the-lawnmower-man\/","title":{"rendered":"The Cautionary-Tale Prescience of \u2018Tron\u2019 and \u2018The Lawnmower Man\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>he science-fiction author and futurist Arthur C. Clarke proposed three adages, or \u201claws\u201d, in his 1962 essay \u201cProfiles of the Future.\u201d The third of these laws holds that \u201cany sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.\u201d Clarke wasn\u2019t merely thinking of the potential for the existence of extraterrestrials or the supernatural; he was observing how humanity\u2019s own technological progress moves so rapidly that our society and morals take a much longer time to catch up to it, until it\u2019s almost too late.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s certainly the case when it comes to life in 2022. We live in a world saturated in and inseparable from what was once known as the Internet or cyberspace, a virtual space that\u2019s become scattered amongst many apps and devices. It can be said that the overwhelming consumption of daily life by social media and various other online spaces snuck up on humanity, gradually chipping away at our focus, energy and time bit-by-bit until most of us began to rely on a regular fix. Just as it can be said that the real-world consequences it has caused was (and still are) a major blind spot for society, with online spaces being too ephemeral, convenient and supposedly anonymous for people to realize that a few taps and clicks here and there can foster enormous worldwide changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thing is, there were numerous canaries in the coal mine when it came to the rise and reign of \u201ccyberspace.\u201d Two such warning bells arrived in the form of a pair of science-fiction movies released exactly a decade apart: 1982\u2019s <em>Tron<\/em> and 1992\u2019s <em>The Lawnmower Man<\/em>. While both films were conceived with an optimistic excitement at the oncoming technology boom, each adopted a fairy tale-like structure to their stories which knowingly hinted at the potential mis-uses of the internet, turning each film into cautionary tales that have now essentially come true.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Director Steven Lisberger, who began his filmmaking career in animation, started thinking about <em>Tron<\/em> when he came across the video game \u201cPong\u201d in the 1970s and realized the world of video games would be a great excuse to utilize a \u201cneon line\u201d style of backlit animation, something that would have \u201cthat disco look.\u201d Given his contacts in the world of animation, Lisberger had friends and colleagues who were not only on the cutting edge in terms of pushing computer generated images into existence, but were getting excited about the possibilities of computer technology in general.<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/20120915031744\/http:\/\/www.denofgeek.com\/Tron\/687709\/interview_justin_springer_and_steven_lisberger_coproducers_of_tron_legacy.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> As Lisberger recalled in 2010,<\/a> \u201cthis very idealistic idea came to us, which was that if we could all access the information in computers, if we could all communicate, wouldn\u2019t the world be a much better place?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Indeed, <em>Tron<\/em> follows that train of thought, depicting a fantasy realm of life inside computers where every human being has their own digital counterpart and the ability to communicate is seen as something sacred. It\u2019s a depiction that predicts the way every human being is represented online through social media today. The movie\u2019s narrative of a man, Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges), finding himself lost in the computer world blurs the line between human \u201cUsers\u201d and digital \u201cPrograms,\u201d pointing out how connected the two are. It\u2019s a very <em>Wizard of Oz<\/em>, <em>Alice in Wonderland<\/em>-style approach to visualizing cyberspace, and as such the world of <em>Tron<\/em> has its very own Wicked Witch\/Red Queen in the form of the Master Control Program. As that name suggests, Lisberger and co-writer Bonnie MacBird waste no subtleties on the characterl the self-aware MCP threatens to take over the Pentagon during the film\u2019s first act, showing how regular everyday programs are literally conscripted into either being slaves to the MCP or thrown into gladiator-type video games where most become \u201cderezzed.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, the MCP is a product of the fictional megacorporation Encom, run by slimy CEO Ed Dillinger (David Warner), who got his position by stealing the work of the genius game creator Flynn. Warner not only plays Dillinger and the MCP\u2019s right-hand program, Sark, he also voices the MCP itself, making it clear that unscrupulous and greedy corporate interests are Lisberger and MacBird\u2019s idea of the forces that could corrupt and ruin what they hoped would be an otherwise utopian future of computer technology. It\u2019s a very apt choice of villain for the 1980s, and while it arguably lets programmers themselves off the hook a bit too much, it still accurately predicts how the corporatization of this brave new world could have deadly, real-life consequences.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/lawnmower-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-18213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/lawnmower-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/lawnmower-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/lawnmower.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Programmers and scientists are certainly not let off the hook by <em>The Lawnmower Man<\/em>\u2014while the film has its military industrial complex analogue, \u201cThe Shop,\u201d front and center as the principal villains, Dr. Lawrence Angelo (Pierce Brosnan) certainly bears some responsibility for the corruption of Jobe (Jeff Fahey), helping turn the mentally challenged man into a crazed, super-intelligent cyberspace deity. The movie began as an adaptation of Stephen King\u2019s 1975 short story of the same name, which had nothing to do with computers, nor did it share the eventual film\u2019s \u201cFrankenstein\u201d by way of \u201cFlowers For Algernon\u201d narrative. Those additions were the contribution of director\/co-writer Brett Leonard and co-writer Gimel Everett, who saw their opportunity to make a movie about an emerging technology called virtual reality instead of making just another horror film.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similar to Lisberger, Leonard was friends with people in the tech world, having lived in the northern California town of Santa Cruz during the \u201880s.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.slashfilm.com\/548116\/brett-leonard-interview-the-lawnmower-man\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> As he recalled in 2016,<\/a> Leonard befriended a man named Jaron Lanier who was developing \u201cthis thing called virtual reality,\u201d something which so impressed Leonard and Everett that they wanted to include it in <em>Lawnmower Man<\/em> to \u201cshow where the technology is going.\u201d (Lanier, as it happens, is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Jaron-Lanier\/e\/B00J1ZK6S6?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_3&amp;qid=1650959670&amp;sr=1-3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a bestselling author<\/a> who is still writing about VR and online spaces; one of his most recent books is entitled \u201cTen Arguments For Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now.\u201d) With virtual reality a still-developing idea at the time and CGI only just becoming an available tool for filmmakers, <em>Lawnmower Man<\/em>\u2019s vision of VR was decidedly psychedelic and surrealistic, with computer generated amorphous shapes representing people in cyberspace (as opposed to <em>Tron<\/em>\u2019s reliance on black &amp; white photography of actors that was then rotoscoped in post-production).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With The Shop (an organization borrowed from other King novels like \u201cFirestarter\u201d and \u201cThe Tommyknockers\u201d) deliberately injecting Jobe with rage-inducing chemicals and Dr. Angelo force-feeding him gigabytes of information, <em>The Lawnmower Man<\/em> essentially predicts the way the internet can easily and effectively radicalize a person, turning them into a high-functioning pseudo-intellectual with a seriously distorted morality and worldview. It also implies the potential for internet addiction: by the film\u2019s finale, Jobe has literally become absorbed by the virtual world, his physical body a lifeless husk.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both <em>Tron<\/em> and <em>The Lawnmower Man<\/em> have a distinctly religious view of the virtual world, deliberately making the communion between realms akin to a spiritual experience. <em>Tron<\/em> sees its Programs communicate with their Users via an I\/O tower that looks and functions like a church, synagogue, or any similar house of worship. <em>Lawnmower Man<\/em> makes its Biblical allusions clear\u2014Jobe\u2019s place of residence is a Catholic church, as if his name wasn\u2019t reference enough\u2014even if they\u2019re all mixed up, presenting Jobe as a blend of Lucifer and Jesus, a fallen angel who is also martyred for our sins and is resurrected within cyberspace.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Connecting this fanciful, futurist material to such lofty philosophical works of literature and cinema must\u2019ve partially accounted for the way <em>Tron<\/em> and <em>The Lawnmower Man<\/em> were initially seen by general audiences as cheesy genre pictures, even though both films contain enough humor so as not to take themselves too seriously. In 1982, computers had only begun entering the household, and in 1992, the Internet was nowhere near commonplace, so these films seemed far more like fantasy than science-fiction at the time. Granted, both movies make big, dramatic leaps in their depictions of technology, erring on the side of what makes a more visual and interesting story than on a grounded examination of the tech.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet looking back on these two movies reveals just how fated humanity\u2019s relationship with the online world was. Lisberger, Leonard, and their casts and crews were only doing the thing any futurist really can: extrapolate from humanity\u2019s past. Despite these cautionary tales, the technology of cyberspace moved faster than anyone expected it to, in ways the world at large didn\u2019t realize until it already happened. All of us became Kevin Flynn, finding ourselves trapped inside the computer world, our Dr. Angelo-like excitement at the shiny new landscape blinding us to the dangers in our midst. Perhaps Clarke\u2019s Third Law should be amended to read that \u201cany sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic until it\u2019s too late.\u201d That wording would be far more applicable, and would hopefully allow us to realize that the ultimate responsibility for technology\u2019s development and use will always lie with ourselves. <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-12029\" style=\"width: 21px;\" src=\"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/crookedc-01.svg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A re-examination of two sci-fi films (released 30 and 40 years ago), and how they may have predicted our Extremely Online present. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":459,"featured_media":18214,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1399],"tags":[1422],"class_list":["post-18212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-looking-back","tag-looking-back"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/459"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18212"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18212\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21990,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18212\/revisions\/21990"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crookedmarquee.com\/stage8\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}