• Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
Crooked Marquee
  • Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
Home
Reviews

Review: Candyman

Aug 26th, 2021 Craig Lindsey
Review: Candyman

When I saw the original Candyman 30 or 200 years ago, even at a young age, I knew it was one of the dumbest things I’d ever seen. It still is.

I mean, here you have this nosy-ass, white grad student (Virginia Madsen) showing up in the Chicago projects, investigating an urban legend about this Black, bee-covered boogeyman (Tony Todd) who apparently only kills other Black people. (In the ‘90s, Black-on-Black crime was even rampant in horror movies.) She summons the somabitch by saying his name five times in the mirror. Not only does he go on a rampage — ol’ boy castrates kids! — Candyman (who now has a baby hostage) also wants the white girl to be his main squeeze. The movie ends with — spoiler alert! — both Candyman and the white girl dying in a bonfire, with the white girl eventually seen as a heroine for saving both the baby and the hood. 

All throughout this obviously-directed-by-a-white-guy spectacle, I kept yelling “Get the entire fuck outta here!” in my head. Adapted from a Clive Barker short story and allegedly inspired by a horrific 1987 murder that John Malkovich tried to make into a movie, I found Candyman to be that most hideous and insidious of scary movies: one that insulted my intelligence and my race. I wasn’t the only one who felt that way; filmmakers Reginald Hudlin and Carl Franklin made it known they were both offended by the flick’s existence. Even Madsen admitted, “I don’t think Spike Lee will like this film.” (It also beget two dumb-ass sequels, where white women once again had to take down this big, bad negro.)

I should’ve known something was up when former Obama impersonator-turned-Get Out director Jordan Peele, a man who’s made it his mission to tell racially-charged spooky stories on the big and small screen, decided to produce a Candyman movie. I thought it was gonna be yet another redonkulous remake of an old slasher favorite. But it appears he and director Nia DaCosta (Little Woods) have joined forces to — as they used to say at the beginning of every Quantum Leap episode — put right what once went wrong. They basically turn the goofy gorefest into the racial-injustice parable it should’ve been in the first damn place.

Finally hitting theaters after several pandemic-halted release dates, this Candyman returns to the Cabrini-Green area in Chicago where the original was mostly based – now a gentrified, hipster haven. That’s where we meet artist Anthony McCoy (Aquaman nemesis Yahya-Abdul Mateen II) and his art gallery-director girlfriend Brianna (Chi-Raq hellraiser Teyonah Parris). Struggling to find something to paint next, he hears the story of the white girl who was burned alive. This gets him in investigative mode, taking pictures inside the area’s boarded-up row houses and interviewing a laundromat owner (Zola psycho pimp Colman Domingo) who tells him about a candyman he saw as a kid, a slow-witted, one-armed man who gave candy to kids and got murdered by the police.

Not only does this dumbass do the whole say-his-name thing, slowly turning him into a possessed fella with decaying skin brought on by a bee sting, McCoy incites other (mainly white) stupidos to do it when he turns the practice into a reflective art piece, ensuring that the Candyman will invisibly but certainly bring the pain.

Both Peele and DaCosta (who co-wrote the script with producer Win Rosenfeld) make a big, ambitious swing with this sequel/reboot/whatever, addressing the myriad issues — gentrification, police brutality, mental illness, plain ol’ systemic racism — that are currently destroying Black folk more than a mythical serial killer ever could. They also use Domingo’s character to sound off on the various, real-life Chicagoans of color who’ve been cruelly victimized and/or wiped out throughout history. He later insinuates that Candyman is more than a pissed-off, 19th-century artist who was murdered for loving a white girl. He’s a swarming, sinister ball of vengeful, Black rage.

Of course, Candyman 2.0 has a small batch of Easter eggs, in-jokes (it’s definitely not a coincidence that the first white guy who gets it is named Clive) and cameos from returning characters. There are also brief bits of humor, mostly involving the superstitious, fight-or-flight behavior Black people exhibit whenever something strange is afoot.

DaCosta actually does something that the original didn’t bother to do: make Chicago look like the fascinating land of architecture — particularly residential architecture —it’s always been. Working with Love, Simon cinematographer John Gulserian, she comes up with interior shots (often in corridors and hallways) that are both foreboding and visually impressive.

As I mentioned before, a lot is crammed in its 91-minute time frame, with some flaws — exposition-dump scenes, over-the-top supporting characters (wait until you met Brianna’s gay brother!), a bonkers, let’s-wrap-it-up-quickly finale — sticking out. It’s still far more clever, engaging and — dare I say it — Blacker than the offensive original. In fact, this Candyman reminded me more of J.D.’s Revenge, the hilariously entertaining, Blaxploitation thriller (and one of my late mother’s favorite films) where Cooley High’s Glynn Turman is a law student possessed by a murdered 1940s gangster looking for vengeance. Until someone makes a long-overdue redo of that one, this will suffice.

B

“Candyman” is in theaters Friday.

  • Tags
  • movie review
Facebook Twitter Google+
Craig Lindsey

Craig Lindsey

Related Posts
Review: <i>Men</i>
Robert Daniels

Review: Men

May 19th, 2022
Review: <i>Emergency</i>
Kimber Myers

Review: Emergency

May 19th, 2022
Review: <i>Pleasure</i>
Kimber Myers

Review: Pleasure

May 12th, 2022
Trending
Sep 23rd 9:00 AM
Reviews

Review: The Starling

Oct 16th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Fade to Black

Feb 12th 9:00 AM
Reviews

Review: Barb & Star Go to Vista Del Mar

Jun 1st 9:00 AM
Movies

No Couture For You: Punk, Fashion, and Cruella

Jul 20th 9:00 AM
Film Fests

Max Borg’s Cannes Film Festival 2021 Diary

Jul 21st 9:00 AM
Reviews

Review: Midnight in the Switchgrass

Jul 26th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

Rouges Tint My World: Daughters of Darkness and its Influence on The Rocky Horror Picture Show

Jul 27th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

David Warner: A Suitable Case for Knighthood

Jul 28th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

The Endless Struggles of Arthurian Legend in Cinema

Aug 2nd 9:00 AM
Movies

Exploring the Sparks Cinematic Universe

blank
cmpopcorn_white3.svg
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Writers Guidelines
  • Members
    • Login
    • SignUp
    • Forums
telephone icon [email protected]
envelope icon [email protected]
© 2014-2022 Crooked™ Publishing
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
blankblank
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}