• Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
  • Follow us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
Crooked Marquee
  • Reviews
    • Watch This
    • VODepths
  • Humor
  • On the Marquee
  • Looking Back
    • Classic Corner
    • Anniversary
  • Film Fests
Home
Looking Back

#ReleaseTheRussellCut: Where’s the Uncut Version of The Devils?

Apr 13th, 2021 Max Borg 2307
#ReleaseTheRussellCut: Where’s the Uncut Version of The Devils?

“My most, indeed my only, political film,” is how Ken Russell described The Devils (1971), an adaptation of John Whiting’s play of the same name and Aldous Huxley’s non-fiction novel The Devils of Loudun. Rooted in historical fact, it revolves around the figures of Urbain Grandier (Oliver Reed), a well-liked priest in the French town of Loudun, and Sister Jeanne des Anges (Vanessa Redgrave), a neurotic nun whose unrequited sexual infatuation with Grandier will lead to his downfall. It is a powerful, provocative piece of work, an examination of madness, lust and corruption, filled with flesh and blood. 

To say it was controversial upon release would be an understatement.: Tthe Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano called for the resignation of Gian Luigi Rondi, who had shown the movie as part of that year’s Venice Film Festival; Roger Ebert gave it one of his rare zero-star reviews; and Alexander Walker, then the critic for the London paper The Evening Standard and notoriously vitriolic when it came to Russell, hated the film so much that a live debate between the two was organized by the BBC. As film critic Mark Kermode notes in his book Hatchet Job, no footage remains of the event, which culminated in Russell smacking Walker on the head with a rolled-up copy of the newspaper where the review was first published (“I wish it had been an iron bar,” Russell said in a 2011 interview). 

Even more strenuous was the director’s relationship with the censors, as well as the studio that agreed to distribute the film: Warner Bros., whose executives, per the booklet that accompanies the 2012 UK DVD edition of the film, described the film as “disgusting s**t” when they first saw it. Given the content, Russell was fully aware of the problems he might have with the BBFC (British Board of Film Classification), and discussed the subject of cuts with the then Secretary of the Board, John Trevelyan, before formally submitting the film. According to Craig Lapper, a Senior Examiner at the BBFC who contributed to the booklet with a complete breakdown of the different versions submitted to the censors, the process began on February 9, 1971, and lasted until May 19, when the film was granted an X certificate for theatrical exhibition in the UK (it was released in British cinemas on July 25). 

Russell was fairly amenable to most suggestions, albeit with a sense of humor: in a note to Trevelyan, cited in Lapper’s essay, he mentions having “slashed the whipping”, referring to one of the film’s more violent moments. Particularly contentious was the back-and-forth regarding the sexual content, which was severely toned down (a scene where it is implied a nun masturbates with a charred femur remained on the cutting room floor). On top of the BBFC’s requests, the director also had to deal with additional demands by the studio, which demanded more cuts to secure an R rating stateside. This US cut (a few minutes shorter than the UK release) became the de facto official version of the film, especially on home video. 

As of 2012, the original UK theatrical cut is available on DVD through the British Film Institute (per the updated BBFC guidelines, the certificate is now 18, for “strong violence and sexualised (sic) nudity”). This edition includes the aforementioned booklet, plus documentaries and commentaries detailing the film’s troubled production history. It is still not the uncut version, though, despite prints existing: Kermode, one of the movie’s most ardent supporters (in 2012, he listed it as one of his ten all-time favorites in a Sight & Sound poll) located and reinstated the missing footage in 2004, and screenings have occurred at film festivals and special one-off events (though less so after Russell’s death ten years ago). 

In a 2014 installment of his now defunct video blog for the BBC , Kermode responded to viewers’ questions about the possibility of releasing Russell’s original, unadulterated cut of the film. As far as the UK is concerned, the BBFC would have no issue granting it a certificate (they attended the 2004 premiere of the uncut version and said as much after the screening), and there’s been interest from both the BFI and – for the US – Criterion to acquire a license to distribute the full version on disc. However, Warner’s official stance is that the film’s content remains an issue, particularly the much-discussed “Rape of Christ” sequence. And yet, with the 50th anniversary looming, one can’t not wonder if something might finally change. After all, if WarnerMedia and AT&T were willing to spend 70 million dollars to complete a film they had once left to die, why not release a cut they already own and have been actively sitting on for almost two decades?

“The Devils” is currently streaming on Shudder.

  • Tags
  • looking back

Share this post:

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest E-mail
Max Borg

Max Borg

Related Posts
Classic Corner: <i>The Great Waldo Pepper</i>
Sean Burns
Looking Back

Classic Corner: The Great Waldo Pepper

Sep 29th, 2023
Why <i>La Bamba</i> Deserves its Current Canonization
Zach Vasquez
Looking Back

Why La Bamba Deserves its Current Canonization

Sep 25th, 2023
Pedro Almodovar Brought Horror to Romance With <i>Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!</i>
Kayleigh Donaldson
Looking Back

Pedro Almodovar Brought Horror to Romance With Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!

Sep 25th, 2023
Classic Corner: <i>Massacre at Central High</i>
Craig J. Clark
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Massacre at Central High

Sep 22nd, 2023
How Richard Linklater’s <i>Dazed and Confused</i> Launched an Informal Semi-Autobiographical Coming-of-Age Trilogy
Josh Bell
Happy Birthday

How Richard Linklater’s Dazed and Confused Launched an Informal Semi-Autobiographical Coming-of-Age Trilogy

Sep 21st, 2023
Harvey's Hellhole: <i>Farewell My Concubine</i>
Craig D. Lindsey
Looking Back

Harvey's Hellhole: Farewell My Concubine

Sep 20th, 2023
Trending
Sep 7th 9:00 AM
Movies

REVIEW: The Nun Just Another Generic Horror Movie They Keep Making out of Habit

Sep 27th 9:00 AM
Movies

Abby Olcese’s Fantastic Fest 2023 Diary

Jul 6th 11:00 AM
Looking Back

Reclaiming The Intern from the #GIRLBOSS Era

Sep 25th 11:00 AM
Looking Back

Why La Bamba Deserves its Current Canonization

Jun 16th 9:00 AM
Looking Back

Classic Corner: Last Tango in Paris

Nov 17th 9:00 AM
Movies

The Strange, Sordid Tale of Charles Bronson Lookalike Robert Bronzi

Jun 8th 5:22 PM
Looking Back

The Politics of The Mummy in 1932, 1999, and 2017

Sep 19th 11:00 AM
Looking Back

Can’t Keep an Old King Down Forever: Bubba Ho-Tep at Twenty

Sep 26th 9:00 AM
Reviews

The Best Movies to Buy or Stream This Week: Past Lives, Elemental, Moonage Daydream and More

May 22nd 9:12 AM
Culture

How the Pulp Boom of the ’90s Led to the Superhero Movies of Today

cmpopcorn_white3.svg
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Writers Guidelines
  • Members
    • Login
    • SignUp
    • Forums
telephone icon [email protected]
envelope icon [email protected]

© 2014- Crooked™ Publishing


Privacy Policy
Terms of Service